Essential
For your first measurements and a focused brand portfolio.
€16.25 per 1,000 credits
- credits per month
- 2,400
- brands at once
- 3
- All tracking and analysis tools
- Unlimited prompts and team members


Study · bvik Tag der Industriekommunikation 2026
We tested 62 websites of TIK participants. How visible are they in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot? We fired off 12,400 prompts and analyzed the answers, most recently in September 2026.
Why it matters
According to a Forrester study, the share of B2B decision-makers using AI systems for search has risen to 94%. If a company does not appear in the answer, its chance of an inquiry drops.
Inquiries often consider only 3–5 companies. Whoever does not make it into the AI answer does not exist for the buyer in that moment.
How strong is the top?
Share of Voice is a brand’s share of all brand mentions in its category. The highest value is 20.7%. Only a single participant exceeds 20%.
On average, participants hold 6.8% of their own category. Only 17 of 62 reach 10% at all, and a single one exceeds 20%.
Distribution across all 62 participants
Who wins the AI answer?
Every question targeted the participant’s core business. Still, in 43 of 62 categories the most-named brand is not them but a competitor.
28 of 62 do not lead in a single one of the four models. 14 do not even rank in the top 10 of their own field, and 2 appear in no answer at all.
participants total
in the top 10 of their category
in the top 3
the most-named brand
Visibility is not stable
We sent each question to the same model five times. Even participants that appear at all are missing from all five runs in 43% of cases. No model is exempt.
ChatGPT is the most stable at 33% unstable mentions. Copilot most often makes participants disappear between two identical runs (54%), with Perplexity close behind (50%).
That is why a one-off check tells you almost nothing. Visibility in AI answers has to be measured continuously.
Share of unstable mentions per model
One model is not the market
Visibility in ChatGPT does not automatically mean visibility in Gemini, Perplexity or Copilot. And more live search does not mean more brand visibility.
| Model | Live web search | Avg brands / answer | Participants invisible |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 99.5 % | 8.40 | 6 |
| Perplexity | 100.0 % | 7.14 | 8 |
| Copilot | 98.1 % | 9.66 | 9 |
| Gemini | 84.8 % | 9.25 | 4 |
Perplexity triggers a live web search on every answer (100%), yet names the fewest brands per answer and makes 8 participants disappear entirely in their own category. Gemini delivers sources least often (85%) but makes the fewest participants disappear (4). Live search and visibility are not the same thing.
Across all brands, 85.8% are missing from at least one of the four models, 71.6% from at least two. Only 14.2% appear in all four. Of the 62 participants, 13 are invisible in at least one model, and 2 in all four.
Which brands the AI prefers
A few large brands appear across many categories. Specialists therefore compete not only with their direct rivals but with the corporations the model knows as a safe answer.
Siemens alone is named 1,546 times, spread across 28 of the 62 categories, and is often the category leader of other participants.
Whoever is not present in their category cedes it to the brands the model knows as a safe answer.
What the AI builds its answers from
B2B AI answers lean on structured external sources: supplier portals, industry directories, market research, manufacturer sites and Wikipedia.
Most-cited domains
Six source types carry the answers
Of 222,056 citations, only 21,536 point to the participant’s own domain; among citations backed by the answer text it is 8%. Onpage is the base — offpage is what the AI explains your brand from. Citation gaps are the new content gaps.
What companies can do now
GEO is not a one-off audit. Five levers to measurably improve your position in AI answers.
Which top sources cite your competitors but not you? Is your brand missing from wlw, induux, europages, industrystock or relevant trade portals — and are the entries current and semantically correct?
What we measured
Ten neutral category questions per participant, sent verbatim and without brand names. Each question targeted the participant’s core business. Competitors were discovered from the answers, not predefined.
From a single brand to multiple locations or a portfolio of clients: we help you set up ucited around your questions, markets and reporting needs.
The SEO and GEO experts at our partner agency morefire can help you from setup through to content strategy.

SEO and GEO expertise. People on your side.
ucited shows how AI talks about your brand and where you can improve. Here’s how it helps our customers in their day-to-day work.
“Clear reporting saves time in everyday agency and business work.”
Axel
Internetwarriors
Understandable reports, practical next steps and a responsive team.
Review summary
Philipp
Welter & Welter
See which competitors appear in AI answers instead of his brand.
Review summary
Björn
SANOSTRA
A prioritised task list to guide implementation.
Review summary
Rüdiger
mediadefine
Specific improvements he can hand straight to his agency.
Review summary
Zoran
arrel
Competitive comparisons and practical guidance on improving visibility.
Review summary
Tim
Renner Morbach
Every dashboard, model and tool in every plan. You choose the credit volume and how many brands you track at once.
For your first measurements and a focused brand portfolio.
€16.25 per 1,000 credits
For regular analysis across topics, models and markets.
€14.83 per 1,000 credits
For teams and agencies with more brands and analysis needs.
€9.94 per 1,000 credits
Included in every plan
Every model · 32 markets · 27 languages
What you should know about ucited and AI visibility.
Read the documentation