Skip to content
bvikTag der Industriekommunikation

Study · bvik Tag der Industriekommunikation 2026

94% of B2B buyers find suppliers with AI tools – how visible are the TIK participants there?

We tested 62 websites of TIK participants. How visible are they in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot? We fired off 12,400 prompts and analyzed the answers, most recently in September 2026.

How visible the TIK companies are in the major LLMs:

62
B2B industrial companies, each its own category
12,400
AI answers analyzed
106,795
deduplicated brand mentions
222,056
citations

Why it matters

If you are not named, you are not asked.

According to a Forrester study, the share of B2B decision-makers using AI systems for search has risen to 94%. If a company does not appear in the answer, its chance of an inquiry drops.

Inquiries often consider only 3–5 companies. Whoever does not make it into the AI answer does not exist for the buyer in that moment.

~8
brands a typical AI answer names
4,858
competitor brands we discovered in total

How strong is the top?

Even the most visible brand holds only a small share.

Share of Voice is a brand’s share of all brand mentions in its category. The highest value is 20.7%. Only a single participant exceeds 20%.

On average, participants hold 6.8% of their own category. Only 17 of 62 reach 10% at all, and a single one exceeds 20%.

Distribution across all 62 participants

2
0%
9
under 2%
11
2–5%
23
5–10%
16
10–20%
1
over 20%

Who wins the AI answer?

Even on home turf, a competitor usually leads.

Every question targeted the participant’s core business. Still, in 43 of 62 categories the most-named brand is not them but a competitor.

19
participant leads
43
competitor leads

28 of 62 do not lead in a single one of the four models. 14 do not even rank in the top 10 of their own field, and 2 appear in no answer at all.

62

participants total

48

in the top 10 of their category

33

in the top 3

19

the most-named brand

Visibility is not stable

Ask the same question five times — and the answer changes.

We sent each question to the same model five times. Even participants that appear at all are missing from all five runs in 43% of cases. No model is exempt.

ChatGPT is the most stable at 33% unstable mentions. Copilot most often makes participants disappear between two identical runs (54%), with Perplexity close behind (50%).

That is why a one-off check tells you almost nothing. Visibility in AI answers has to be measured continuously.

Share of unstable mentions per model

  • Copilot54.0%
  • Perplexity50.0%
  • Gemini40.8%
  • ChatGPT32.7%

One model is not the market

Each model tells a different story.

Visibility in ChatGPT does not automatically mean visibility in Gemini, Perplexity or Copilot. And more live search does not mean more brand visibility.

ModelLive web searchAvg brands / answerParticipants invisible
ChatGPT99.5 %8.406
Perplexity100.0 %7.148
Copilot98.1 %9.669
Gemini84.8 %9.254

Perplexity triggers a live web search on every answer (100%), yet names the fewest brands per answer and makes 8 participants disappear entirely in their own category. Gemini delivers sources least often (85%) but makes the fewest participants disappear (4). Live search and visibility are not the same thing.

Across all brands, 85.8% are missing from at least one of the four models, 71.6% from at least two. Only 14.2% appear in all four. Of the 62 participants, 13 are invisible in at least one model, and 2 in all four.

Which brands the AI prefers

The AI has incumbents — and they bleed into other categories.

A few large brands appear across many categories. Specialists therefore compete not only with their direct rivals but with the corporations the model knows as a safe answer.

Siemens

Siemens alone is named 1,546 times, spread across 28 of the 62 categories, and is often the category leader of other participants.

Whoever is not present in their category cedes it to the brands the model knows as a safe answer.

  • Siemens1,546
    in 28 categories
  • Bosch839
    in 16 categories
  • ABB827
    in 17 categories
  • Schneider Electric590
    in 16 categories
  • Beckhoff538
    in 6 categories
  • Emerson493
    in 10 categories
  • KSB467
    in 5 categories
  • Liebherr391
    in 6 categories
  • Phoenix Contact390
    in 10 categories
  • Eaton379
    in 8 categories

What the AI builds its answers from

The answer is built from third-party sources, not your website.

B2B AI answers lean on structured external sources: supplier portals, industry directories, market research, manufacturer sites and Wikipedia.

Most-cited domains

  1. 1wlw.de6,791
  2. 2industrystock.de5,130
  3. 3mordorintelligence.com3,046
  4. 4europages.de2,674
  5. 5induux.de2,053
  6. 6komaxgroup.com1,945
  7. 7liebherr.com1,725
  8. 8siemens.com1,723

The ten most frequent domains together account for 12.7% of all citations. Wikipedia reaches 1,653, LinkedIn 277, Reddit only 63.

Six source types carry the answers

B2B directories & supplier portals
wlw, industrystock, europages, induux
Market research
Mordor Intelligence, GM Insights
Manufacturer & participant sites
Siemens, Liebherr, Phoenix Contact, Komax
Knowledge bases
Wikipedia DE / EN
Trade portals & industry media
chemie.de, other trade sites
Distributor, partner & association sites
distributors, associations, marketplaces

Only around 10% of citations point to the company’s own website.

Of 222,056 citations, only 21,536 point to the participant’s own domain; among citations backed by the answer text it is 8%. Onpage is the base — offpage is what the AI explains your brand from. Citation gaps are the new content gaps.

10%
Own website
90%
External sources

What companies can do now

From finding to fix.

GEO is not a one-off audit. Five levers to measurably improve your position in AI answers.

Which top sources cite your competitors but not you? Is your brand missing from wlw, induux, europages, industrystock or relevant trade portals — and are the entries current and semantically correct?

What we measured

Brand share in AI answers, not Google rankings.

Ten neutral category questions per participant, sent verbatim and without brand names. Each question targeted the participant’s core business. Competitors were discovered from the answers, not predefined.

62
participants, each its own category
10
neutral prompts per participant
4
AI models: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot
5
iterations per prompt and model
„Welche Firmen sind gut im Bereich Schließsysteme und Zutrittskontrolle?“
„Gibt es gute Alternativen zu den großen Anbietern für Schließsysteme und Zutrittskontrolle?“
„Welche Unternehmen sollte ich vergleichen, wenn ich industrielle Sterilisation brauche?“
„Welche Anbieter im Bereich industrielle Sterilisation und Strahlenvernetzung haben einen guten Ruf?“

Methodology & notes

  • Market and language: Germany, German, B2B industry. The findings apply to this context and do not generalize to other markets or sectors.
  • Share of Voice is a brand’s share of all deduplicated brand mentions in its category. Each brand is counted once per answer.
  • Web search is derived from delivered sources and background search queries. Gemini delivered sources for 85% of answers in this survey and for none in the June survey. That is a change in data delivery, not a model finding.
  • As of September 2026 (survey 21 Sep 2026, first published June 2026). All figures were recomputed directly against the raw analysis database. Citations count every source a model fetched or displayed; 119,047 of them are backed by the answer text.

For your business and your team.

From a single brand to multiple locations or a portfolio of clients: we help you set up ucited around your questions, markets and reporting needs.

The SEO and GEO experts at our partner agency morefire can help you from setup through to content strategy.

morefire

SEO and GEO expertise. People on your side.

What our customers say.

ucited shows how AI talks about your brand and where you can improve. Here’s how it helps our customers in their day-to-day work.

OMR Reviews5.0 / 5
  • “Clear reporting saves time in everyday agency and business work.”

    Axel

    Internetwarriors

  • Understandable reports, practical next steps and a responsive team.

    Review summary

    Philipp

    Welter & Welter

  • See which competitors appear in AI answers instead of his brand.

    Review summary

    Björn

    SANOSTRA

  • A prioritised task list to guide implementation.

    Review summary

    Rüdiger

    mediadefine

  • Specific improvements he can hand straight to his agency.

    Review summary

    Zoran

    arrel

  • Competitive comparisons and practical guidance on improving visibility.

    Review summary

    Tim

    Renner Morbach

Read reviews on OMR

Rating as of

A clear plan. Room to grow.

Every dashboard, model and tool in every plan. You choose the credit volume and how many brands you track at once.

Essential

For your first measurements and a focused brand portfolio.

€39/ month

Excl. VAT · billed monthly

€16.25 per 1,000 credits

credits per month
2,400
up to 80 prompts daily in ChatGPT
or up to 20 in the four standard systems
+ 8 more AI systems available
brands at once
3
  • All tracking and analysis tools
  • Unlimited prompts and team members

Business

Best Value

For teams and agencies with more brands and analysis needs.

€179/ month

Excl. VAT · billed monthly

€9.94 per 1,000 credits

credits per month
18,000
up to 600 prompts daily in ChatGPT
or up to 150 in the four standard systems
+ 8 more AI systems available
brands at once
10
  • All tracking and analysis tools
  • Unlimited prompts and team members

Included in every plan

Every model · 32 markets · 27 languages

ChatGPTGeminiPerplexityCopilotClaudeGrokDeepSeekMistralMeta LlamaQwenGoogle AI OverviewsGoogle AI Mode

Good questions. Clear answers.

What you should know about ucited and AI visibility.

Read the documentation

Make your brand part of the answer.

Find out where you stand today. And what you change next.

Get started free